Murder on the Orient Express 2017 Murder, she wrote, and Hollywood loved her for it. Or they used to, at least â plundering Agatha Christieâs vast catalog of posh, stabby whodunits for countless screen adaptations. But itâs taken actor-director Kenneth Branagh to sweep her from the dustier corners of PBS to center stage again in his Murder on the Orient Express, a lushly old-fashioned adaptation wrapped in a veritable turducken of pearls, monocles, and international movie stars. Branagh himself takes the plum role of one of Christieâs most beloved creations, the fussily brilliant Belgian detective Hercule pronounced Air-kool; âI do not slay ze lionsâ Poirot. A prim 1930s dandy with a penchant for bone-dry bons mots and a mustache so magnificent it looks like an eagle has landed its wingspan on his upper lip, he solves seemingly impossible crimes with a squinted eye and a flick of his silver walking stick. But trouble tends to find the good inspector, and so even a brief respite on the luxe Express â âthree days free of care, concern, or crimeâ â becomes a snowbound CSI when a shady art dealer who believes heâs marked for death Johnny Depp, doing his best dime-store Al Capone attempts to enlist Poirotâs help in ferreting out his would-be assassin. The suspects are legion It could be his long-suffering secretary Josh Gad or butler Derek Jacobi, or the purring widow Michelle PfeifÂfer he nearly kissed in the corridor. Then again, thereâs also something furtive about clever governess Mary Daisy Ridley and her hardly secret lover, Dr. Arbuthnot Hamiltonâs Leslie Odom Jr.; the imperious Princess Dragomiroff and her cowed German maid Judi Dench and Olivia Colman, respectively; pious Pilar, the saintly missionary with the jagged scar on her cheek PenĂ©lope Cruz; slick Cuban auto magnate Marquez Manuel Garcia-Rulfo; and jumpy Austrian professor Gerhard ÂWillem Dafoe. Stashed somewhere in there too are an elusive Count and Countess, high on ballet and barbiturates. The resolution of the movieâs central mystery is almost endearingly corny, less shocking twist than slow dinner-theater twirl. But Branagh executes his double duties with a gratifyingly light touch, tweaking the storyâs more mothballed elements without burying it all in winky wham-bam modernity. His Poirot isnât just highbrow camp, heâs a melancholy soul with a strict moral code. And his superhuman intuition serves him well; in the final scenes, he may just smell a sequel. B+ Murder on the Orient Express 2017
Murderon the Orient Express is a 2017 mystery thriller film directed by Kenneth Branagh with a screenplay by Michael Green, based on This review contains spoilers, click expand to view. Admittedly I enjoyed this movie a little less than expected. It looks beautiful, has an A-list cast and of course is adapted from a book by legendary crime writer Agatha Christie. I took a Christie expert to the theatre with me, who has over the years read everything that bears her name. When Kenneth Branagh appeared on screen for the first time, she turned to me and said "No, Nooo, Noooooo". So if you're a hardcore Hercule Poirot fan, then you may find this hard to watch as Brannagh does not embody that character as faithfully as he is written. If you don't care about that whatsoever then, good news, you'll probably enjoy this incarnation a lot more. There are a lot of very well known actors in this that share screen time with each other and don't take up a lot of individual attention. Daisy Ridley and Michelle Pfeiffer do seem to get more time. Pfeifer is electric; I wish she'd do more movies. Of course, there were no weak performances as you would expect from a group of this calibre. Johnny Depp as much as I love him does ham it up terribly, this seems to be an ongoing feature of all his work these days, but his character is the pace does seem stilted, and it drags on a little too long for me. Being shot entirely in a studio, all of the environments outside the train were CG, even though they proved stunning. A couple of the backdrops, although pretty, did not look photoreal which you'd expect from a feature like this. The ending set the franchise up for a sequel, Death on the Nile, another Christie book so if you enjoyed this one then there's another to look forward to. It's a decent movie, and the all-star cast provides a novelty that you won't get in any films these days. Worth a look.⊠Expand ï»żKristopherBowman joins Ryan and Tyler to discuss the film that puts a moustache in murder mystery: âMurder on the Orient Express (2017)â. Our sarcastic predictions are more accurate than they should be, weâre disappointed by several cast members we usually like, and we all agree this might be the worst murder mystery ever! MenuWatchlistENFully supportedEnglish United StatesPartially supportedFrançais CanadaFrançais FranceDeutsch Deutschlandà €Âčà €¿à €âà €Šà „⏠à €ÂĂ Â€ÂŸĂ Â€Â°Ă Â€Â€Italiano ItaliaPortuguĂÂȘs BrasilEspañol EspañaEspañol MĂ©xicoMurder on the Orient ExpressEditRoger Ebert [Susan Wloszczyna]ReelViews [James Berardinelli]New York Times [Glenn Kenny]The Village Voice [April Wolfe]Flick Filosopher [MaryAnn Johanson]100 Films in a Year [Richard Nelson]150Film [Emre Cogulu]Turkish411Celeb [Amir Siregar]411Celeb [Susan Granger]A Film a Day [Sonia Cerca]A Film Life [Ian Taylor, Sheila Taylor]A Potpourri of Vestiges [Murtaza Ali Khan]A Quarta Parede [PatrĂÂcia Miguez]PortugueseA Selenator's View [Daniel O'Connor]AARP [Anne Wakefield Hoyt]SpanishAcademia de Cinema [Fabio Ruiz]PortugueseAcciĂÂłn Cine [JesĂÂșs Usero]SpanishAdira Oktaroza [Adira Oktaroza]IndonesianAFK Sinemada [Ali F. Kisakurek]TurkishAll of Cinema [Evgeniy Nefyodov]RussianAll that Cinema! [Monica I.]ItalianAllmĂ€nstadesbloggen [Erik Otterberg]SwedishAloha CriticĂÂłn [Antonio MĂ©ndez]SpanishAlta Peli [Santiago Balestra]SpanishAmazing Cinema [Andrea Di Cosmo]ItalianAmir at the Movies [Amir Syarif Siregar]IndonesianAndy's Film Blog [Andy Kaiser]Anna, Look! [Emma Bung]Anthony's Film Review [Anthony]Assholes Watching Movies [Jay Taylor]Associazione Acec Ancci [Francesco Crispino]ItalianAustin Chronicle [Kimberley Jones]AV Forums - Ultra HD Blu-ray [Simon Crust]AV Forums [Sharuna Warner]Average Joe's [Arlen Chastain]Avis 2 FemmesFrenchBack to the Movies [Frank Mengarelli]Basement Rejects [JP Roscoe]Battleship Pretension [Rudie Obias]Before the Cyborgs [Michael Vecchio]Ben Meyers International Movie Critics [Ben Meyers]Big Fanboy [Ronnie Malik]Big Tuna on Film Blog [Big Tuna]Bina007 Movies [Caterina Benincasa]Bios Agenda [Michelle Iwema]DutchBloc de JosepSpanishBlogbusters [Nicoletta Steiger]GermanBlu-ray [Brian Orndorf]Blu-ray [Jeffrey Kauffman]Blu-ray Rezensionen - 4K UHD [Timo Wolters]GermanContribute to this pageSuggest an edit or add missing contentLearn more about contributingEdit pageMore from this titleMore to exploreRecently viewedYou have no recently viewed pages Moviereview: âMurder on the Orient Expressâ By Gary Dowell | 2017-11-09T:00 November 9th, 2017 | Actor-director Kenneth Branaghâs workmanlike adaptation of Agatha Christieâs Murder on the Orient Express is diverting, crammed full of strong but unremarkable performances from an impressive ensemble cast, and mercifully shortThere is a moment early in Kenneth Branaghâs intricately constructed adaptation of Agatha Christieâs classic whodunnit when Hercule Poirot Branagh stands on the deck of a ship as it leaves Istanbul. Poirot is captured center frame The deck, the railing, the adjacent cabin and the sea itself are balanced perfectly around him. The shot is illustrative of Murder on the Orient Express as a whole, which centers upon Poirot as the audienceâs guide through the cinematic lattice, and also as the center of the filmâs thematic and indeed philosophical exploration. As one would expect in a detective drama, Poirot provides the balance between mystery and understanding, but this conceit goes further, as this very balance becomes less steady and understanding less certain as the narrative unfolds. The twists and turns of the story are well known to many. This reviewer, however, had the pleasure of not knowing the story at all and therefore encountered the titular murder and subsequent investigation as a series of reveals and genuine surprises. Even those familiar with the story, however, may find much to enjoy with Branaghâs stylish presentation and delivery. Director of photography Haris Zambarloukos creates a mobile and captivating cinematography, including some extraordinary overhead shots that delay showing the full extent of a scene just long enough for the viewer to cease expecting it, before the camera pans to reveal further details. Zambarloukos also captures much of the film in long takes reminiscent of the work of Emmanuel Lubezki in âBirdmanâ and âThe Revenant.â Like the latter of these, a cold and snowy environment enshrouds the events of Murder On The Orient Express, vast mountains dwarfing the eponymous train as it moves with a smooth motion similar to that of the camera. This fluid visual style neatly complements the wattage of the starry cast who play the passengers aboard the famous train, all of which are neatly sketched and provide a colorful collection of characters. From Johnny Deppâs âPirates of the Caribbean Dead Men Tell No Talesâ oily Edward Ratchett who spars words with Poirot over cake, to Judi Denchâs âVictoria and Abdulâ haughty Princess Dragomiroff and her seemingly downtrodden maid Hildegarde Schmidt Olivia Colman, âTyrannosaurâ; from Michelle Pfeifferâs âmother!â overly garrulous Caroline Hubbard to regular Branagh collaborator Derek Jacobiâs âMy Week with Marilynâ Edward Henry Masterman; from Willem Dafoeâs âThe Florida Projectâ curiously accented Gerhard Hardman to Daisy Ridleyâs âStar Wars The Last Jediâ stellar turn as the cool and collected Mary Debenham, each passenger/suspect is more than they seem and provides an excellent foil to Poirot. Yet the film ensures that Poirot himself is also layered, as a constant strain of melancholy plays behind Branaghâs searching eyes and flamboyant mustache. Poirotâs remarkable deductive abilities and suggestions of obsessive compulsive disorder are balanced with regular references to a photograph of a lost love, and a broader sadness at a world that he believes is not how it should be. This belief feeds into the philosophical investigation of Murder on the Orient Express, which seems to develop in response to Poirotâs a rather naĂŻve moral perspective, expressed early in the film âI can only see a world as it should be. It makes an imperfection stick out like the nose on your face.â His view proves highly significant, as while the viewer may agree or disagree with Poirot, it makes sense that a detective would create a mental construct as a bulwark against the contradictions and iniquities that Branaghâs character encounters. But as Poirot and the audience learns, if no one is what they seem, perhaps the world at large is similarly dubious and possessed of shades of gray. This conceit plays into the visuals, as at times the largely digital exteriors are at odds with the physical interiors. Jim Clayâs production design evokes a sense of period, location and society, but the digital effects seem overly pristine and smack of artifice, modernity and transience. Yet this tension is thematically effective as Murder On The Orient Express is acutely interested in the tensions between artifice and reality. Many shots capture the characters through multi-paned windows, expressing the multiple roles they play and the various perspectives available, both narratively and morally. The film emphasizes such relativity in moments when Poirot reconstructs the events of the titular and other crimes, in a manner similar though more reserved than that seen in âThe Limehouse Golemâ earlier this year. Also unlike that film, Murder On The Orient Express eschews gore, which again supports the somewhat conservative morality that Poirot puts forward, and adds further meat to the philosophical meal. So much visual and narrative backflipping might become wearing if without purpose, but where the film goes with this perspective proves to be arresting and feels quite radical. At one point there seems to be a resolution that feels somewhat anticlimactic, but more is still to come before Branagh/Poirot delivers the coup de grace that is both expected yet refreshing and pleasingly ambiguous. This ambiguity undercuts the overtly artificial construction of the filmâs milieu, demonstrating that standards of morality and ethics may be as much a construct as the mechanisms of a railroad, or indeed a plot. It is the filmâs philosophical investigation, that perhaps Ludwig Wittgenstein might enjoy, that elevates Murder on the Orient Express into something special. Combined with his starry cast, intricate and vivacious storytelling, Branagh has breathed new life into a classic story, making it fresh, vibrant and relevant.
Review In this retelling of Agatha Christieâs classic murder-mystery, a shady businessman (Johnny Depp) is stabbed to death aboard an opulent train service, and everyone among the eclectic I know. I KNOW. Ever since seeing the trailer for the mystery thriller âMurder on the Orient Express,â a question has been nagging at you. Itâs not who among a diverse array of actors including Judi Dench as a Russian princess, Willem Dafoe as a German professor, Penelope Cruz as a depressed missionary and Johnny Depp as a thuggish art dealer, is the killer. But why has a small furry mammal disguised as a magnificent beast of a handlebar mustache in 50 shades of silvery gray taken up residence under Kenneth Branaghâs nose? The hair apparent seems specifically designed to practically steal every scene it appears in during this sumptuous yet ultimately stuffy and overstuffed big-screen return visit to Agatha Christieâs most durable novel. It's even responsible for the filmâs best sight gag. If Branagh, the star and director behind the 21st-century digitally-enhanced stab at bringing this ensemble vehicle back to life wanted to make a statement to distinguish this take on his world-famous Belgian detective Hercule Poirot from any other, he certainly has. In the 1974 movie adaptation helmed by Sidney Lumet, Albert Finney sported a pert black swatch with Dali-esque twirls at the ends. Boring, right? Branaghâs fuzzy wuzzy is like an ocean wave of whiskers, from ear to shining ear. Best supporting player? That honor goes to that dashing splash of a soul patch on his chin. OK, I am stalling. Letâs accentuate the positive first. The script by Michael Green âBlade Runner 2049â does a bang-up job of introducing us to Poirot, a fuss-budget stickler who demands perfectly cooked four-minute eggs and tsk-tsks their imperfect dimensionsâand then doesnât even bother to eat them. He is a control freak who insists on balance in everything, from how a tie sits around a manâs neck to impeccably baked bread. The place is Jerusalem actually, Malta as a stand-in and the year is 1934. Poirot is at the Wailing Wall about to deliver the solution to a crime tied to three clerics of different faiths and a stolen artifact. With the showbiz panache of a Vegas magician, he reveals the perpetrator with an unexpected flourish involving a cane. That sends the message, âHey, this could be fun.â But matters get perfunctory rather quickly when fellow passengers whose baggage clearly includes secrets begin to pop up, including Daisy Ridley Rey in âStar Wars The Force Awakensâ as a porcelain-skinned governess and Leslie Odom Jr. Aaron Burr in Broadwayâs âHamiltonâ as a doctor who attempt to disguise they are an interracial couple. Those marquee credits are bound to draw in the under-30 demographic. But, alas, the only fully fleshed-out being turns out to be Poirot, who moons over a portrait of a lost love and undergoes an existential crisis of sorts when he finds himself unexpectedly confounded when a dead body turns up on the train with an even dozen stab wounds. The luxury locomotive traveling from Istanbul to Calais also comes to a halt about a half-hour in when an avalanche causes it to stop in its tracks atop a dangerous trestle. I wish I could say that the storyline at least picks up steam, but it never quite does especially since it devolves into a series of private interrogations by the imperious Poirot in a cafĂ© car. Michelle Pfeiffer does what she can as a man-hungry rich widow searching for her next husband. Derek Jacobi and Josh Gad conspire as a valet and assistant to Deppâs scar-faced hoodlum. Other performers barely have the presence or enough dialogue to make much of an impression including the incredibly talented Olivia Colman as Denchâs lady in waiting. In addition, there are veiled allusions to the 1932 kidnapping of aviator Charles Lindberghâs baby son, which few besides history buffs will recognize today. Branagh, the actor, comes through unscathed. Branagh, the director, not so much. He did wonders with making Shakespeare relevant for young audiences with his âHenry Vâ and found a way to make Disneyâs live-action âCinderellaâ seem fresh and new. But despite camera trickery with ineffective overhead shots and a long one-take scene as Poirot boards the moving train, there is too little levity and cleverness afoot, especially with a cast whose talent is barely tapped. The key isnât whodunit but how you do it. However, that mustacheâwhich even grows limp and messy when matters get dicey for Poirotâdeserves a place in the pantheon of great follicle-ly enhanced performances. Perhaps it could sit alongside George Clooneyâs waxed-to-perfection facial accoutrement in âO Brother, Where Art Thou?â As for âMurder on the Orient Express,â it squeaks by as passable entertainment by just a hair. Susan Wloszczyna Susan Wloszczyna spent much of her nearly thirty years at USA TODAY as a senior entertainment reporter. Now unchained from the grind of daily journalism, she is ready to view the world of movies with fresh eyes. Now playing Film Credits Murder on the Orient Express 2017 114 minutes Latest blog posts about 1 hour ago about 4 hours ago about 5 hours ago 1 day ago Comments Reviewby Terry Staunton. The challenge in filming one of the worldâs best-loved whodunnits is keeping viewersâ attention while telling a story they already know. A movie about how much of a royal pain in the ass it was to kill someone before civilians had easy access to AR-15s, Kenneth Branaghâs âMurder on the Orient Expressâ is an undercooked Christmas ham of a movie, the kind of flamboyant holiday feast that Hollywood doesnât really serve anymore. Arrestingly sumptuous from the very first shot and filmed in glorious 65mm, this cozy new riff on Agatha Christieâs classic mystery is such an old-fashioned yarn that it could have been made back in 1934 if not for all the terrible CGI snow and a late-career, post-disgrace Johnny Depp performance that reeks of 21st century fatigue. Indeed, itâs hard to overstate just how refreshing it feels to see a snug, gilded piece of studio entertainment that doesnât involve any spandex. Or, more accurately, how refreshing it would have felt had Branagh understood why Christieâs story has stood the test of time. You know the plot, even if youâve forgotten the twist. The world is between wars, winter is settling in, and famous Belgian detective Hercule Poirot Branagh is being summoned back to Britain for his next case. The fastest way there The Orient Express, one of those first class sleeper that America dumped in favor of Amtrak. A gilded mahogany serpent so refined that passengers are inspired to wear tuxedos to the dining car and directors are inspired to weave through the cabins in elegant tracking shots that bring us right on board, the Orient Express is an exclusive experience for a certain class of people. The paying customers on this particular trip naturally resemble a game of âClue.â Thereâs a thirsty heiress Michelle Pfeiffer, a missionary PenĂ©lope Cruz, a plainclothes Nazi Willem Dafoe, a smattering of royalty that ranges in age from Judi Dench to âSing Streetâ breakout Lucy Boynton, a governess Daisy Ridley, holding her own without a lightsaber in her hands, and the man she loves in secret âHamiltonâ MVP Leslie Odom Jr., a movie star in the making. Thereâs also Deppâs crooked art dealer â the eventual corpse â and Josh Gad as his right-hand man; the cast is so deep that Derek Jacobi barely rates a mention. But one star forces the others into his orbit, and that is Branagh himself. Poirot has always been the engine for Christieâs mysteries, and not their fuel, but Branaghâs version doesnât see things that way. In this script, penned by âBlade Runner 2049â screenwriter Michael Green, Poirot is always the top priority. From the stilted prologue in which the great detective is introduced with an undue degree of suspense, to the nauseating farewell that inevitably teases a Hercule Poirot Cinematic Universe, Branaghâs take on the character is lodged somewhere between a Shakespearian fool and a superhero. Filtered through a PepĂ© Le Pew accent that stinks from start to finish, heâs a walking spotlight in a film that feels like a Broadway revival, a live-action cartoon whoâs more mustache than man. Branagh chews a dangerous amount of scenery for such a confined set, but the real problem is what the film has to do in order to justify his exaggerated presence It has to give Poirot an arc. Once the train derails on a rickety wooden bridge and Depp winds up dead in his cabin, the story should shift into mystery mode, with Poirot instigating our own imaginations. Here, however, Branagh blocks us out. What Christie learned from the likes of Arthur Conan Doyle is that geniuses are only believable if theyâre actually geniuses â detective stories donât work if they hinge on their protagonists sleuthing out something that a child could see for themselves. Thatâs true of the mysteries, and itâs true of their solutions. Poirot is supposed to be a genius, but here heâs an idiot savant. âThere is right and there is wrong,â he declares early on, âand there is nothing in between.â âMurder on the Orient Expressâ Youâd think, after solving however many cases, that he might have figured that out by now. But no, Poirot is obsessed with balance and restoring order to the world. The eggs he eats for breakfast have to be the same size. After accidentally stepping in horse poop with one shoe, he deliberately steps into it with the other. In a movie shot from so many dutch angles that the screen starts to seem tilted, Poirot is the only person who doesnât recognize that the world isnât flat, and that morality can never be perfectly measured. Itâs agonizing to watch the brilliant detective work out such a simple concept, Branaghâs film growing long in the tooth even though itâs selling itself short. âMurder on the Orient Expressâ is a creaky whodunnit in this day and age, and thereâs not much that Branagh can or chooses to do about that without disrespecting the source material. His well-meaning but half-assed reach for relevance involves a certain degree of wokeness, this version highlighting the pluralism of Christieâs original in its backhanded celebration of American diversity, its conclusion that any true melting pot is sustained by fostering a mutual desire for justice. Race comes to the fore, with Odom inhabiting a role that was once played by Sean Connery. Interesting things percolate under the surface, as all of the passengers are traveling with a lot of baggage. But the movie only cares about the suspects for as long as theyâre sharing the screen with Poirot. Even Pfeifferâs big moment is relegated to the end credits, where she can be heard singing a love ballad called âNever Forget.â Like everything else here, itâs hard to remember. A handsomely furnished holiday movie that should have devoted more attention to its many ornaments and less to the tinsel at the top, this âMurder on the Orient Expressâ loses steam as soon as it leaves the station. Grade C âMurder on the Orient Expressâ opens in theaters on Friday, November 10. Sign Up Stay on top of the latest breaking film and TV news! Sign up for our Email Newsletters here. GoQNQ.